|
Companies have worked hard at restructuring themselves in response
to the dramatic changes that have occurred in the economy
and in their marketplaces in recent years. Here are a few
thoughts concerning some of the serious errors companies have
committed in their efforts to change:
Mistake 1: Laying Off Only Lower-Level Support Staff
Personnel decisions are made by senior and middle management—
who, of course, are not going to choose themselves for
outplacement. As a result, the company ends up with many
‘‘chiefs’’ but not enough ‘‘Indians.’’ Six-figure executives spend
their time typing, photocopying, and faxing when they should be
meeting with customers and planning strategies.
Executives should prioritize entire programs, products, and
markets according to profitability and opportunity. Maintaining
or even increasing the number of support staff and expanding
their responsibilities makes more time available to executives to
develop the business. Leave the more routine tasks to those who
are best trained (and appropriately paid) to perform them.
Mistake 2: Seeing the Future as an Extension of the Past.
During times of marketplace turmoil and uncertainty, some
companies seek out those programs, strategies, and attitudes
that worked well in the past. This provides a level of organizational
comfort and eases the tensions associated with change.
However, sticking to what has always worked well may, in fact,
be perpetuating approaches that are no longer valid as a result of
new market conditions.
There should be no sacred cows when the company under Selected
achieves. Reexamine and reprioritize all of the company’s operations
and activities.
Mistake 3: Not Recycling Past Ideas That Merit Current
Consideration
Whether an idea is profitable or not depends on both the timing
of its implementation and the management support it receives.
Something that did not work seven years ago may have considerable
merit now.
The market may currently need some products and services
that it did not need in the past. List, explore, and give consideration
to all ideas. With input from everyone concerned, make a
list of all possible courses of action. Some resurrected fundamentals
or past failures may in fact save the day.
Mistake 4: Reducing Price Rather Than Adding Value
Giving the customer a price discount may result in a sale. It can
also encourage the customer either to expect further discounts
in the future or to ask, ‘‘If you can afford to reduce the price now,
does that mean that you were gouging me in the past?’’
Your objective is to create a loyal market, not merely to make
a sale. Pressures to reduce the price are lessened when you add
value to the sale. Value-added features could include:
- Faster delivery
- Higher quality
- Educating customers on product applications
- User conferences
- Focus groups for product improvement
- Improved customer service
These activities enhance your competitive position.
Getting a new customer is very difficult. Keeping an existing
customer happy is a great challenge. Getting back a customer that
you have already lost is almost impossible.
Mistake 5: Ignoring the 80 Percent/20 Percent Rule
You need to realize that 20 percent of your customers account for
80 percent of your revenue, and 20 percent of your products result
in 80 percent of your shipments. Less positively, 20 percent
of your employees account for 80 percent of your absenteeism,
and 20 percent of your customers are responsible for 80 percent
of your overdue accounts receivable.
Companies confuse activity with productivity and productivity
with effectiveness. They try to be all things to all people.
Every order receives fanatical attention from exhausted, overworked
people who hope and believe that if they can just work
harder, things will improve. Focus your energies on the activities
that are most important. The least important 80 percent of all
corporate activity results in only 20 percent of the achievement.
Do not dilute the effort and compromise the performance of the
most important tasks by expending too much energy on that
least important 80 percent. Intelligent corporate prioritizing and
time management ensures that the most important work gets
done.
Achievement = Productivity = Effectiveness = Profitability
Mistake 6: Holding On to Sacred Cows
The entire business should be evaluated periodically, perhaps at
budget time. Is each of the product lines and markets still providing
its expected contribution? Is any product line or market consuming
an inordinate share of corporate resources, beyond what
is justified by present and expected future performance? What
other, more profitable ventures can be implemented with underproductive
resources? Should we really be in this business? |