|
Many mentors of minority professionals assume that
their job begins and ends with the one-on-one relationships
they establish with their proteges. This is hardly
true. Mentors, especially those at the executive level,
must do much more by actively supporting broader
efforts and initiatives at their organizations to help cre-
ate the conditions that foster the upward mobility of
people of color. Specifically, they can do the following:
• Ensure that the pool of people being considered for
promotions and key assignments reflects the diversity
in the organization.
• Promote executive development workshops and seminars
that address racial issues.
• Support in-house minority associations, including
networking groups.
• Help colleagues manage their discomfort with race. In
a meeting to decide whether someone of color should
be promoted, for example, a person can help focus the
discussion on the individual’s actual performance
while discounting racial issues disguised as legitimate
concerns (such as vague criticisms that the managerial
style of the minority candidate “doesn’t fit in”).
• Challenge implicit rules, such as those that assume
that people who weren’t fast movers early in their
careers will never rise to the executive suites.
In conclusion, I should address one of the most insidious
implicit rules of all: the two-tournament model.
Many companies might be tempted to accept it as an
empirical reality. Some might even want to make it policy
by tacitly accepting that minorities cannot be fasttracked
in their early careers or by formally creating two
separate career tournaments—one for whites and one
for minorities.
I believe that any acceptance—let alone conscious
replication—of the two-tournament system is a mistake.
First, it unfairly institutionalizes the “tax” of added time
that minorities have to pay as a result of existing racial
barriers. As a consequence, a higher standard is set for
their participation in the main competition for executive
jobs. Second, such a policy
would likely result in a number
of high-performing and
ambitious minorities, before their
careers could accelerate. It
was beyond the scope of my
study to determine exactly how many people of color
with executive potential, but I did
encounter many executives who were surprised when
their best minority talent left “just as good things were
about to happen.” Lastly, a two-tournament model could
eventually lead to backlash among white plateaued managers
who, not realizing that they had been passed over because they were not deemed executive material,
become resentful toward the promising minorities
taking off.
But I am not advocating a one-tournament system of
fast-tracking. After all, it is no accident that people of
color haven’t been fast-tracked in the past. One reason is
that organizations have been largely ineffective in helping
minorities establish relationships with mentors.
Thus, artificially placing minority professionals onto a
fast track without first changing the underlying process
dynamics would set up those individuals for failure.
Organizations instead should provide a range of
career paths, all uncorrelated with race, that lead to the
executive suite. Ideally, this system of movement would
allow variation across all groups—people could move at
their own speed based on their
individual strengths and needs, not their race. Achieving
this system, however, would require integrating the principles
of opportunity, development, and diversity into
the fabric of the organization’s management practices
and human resource systems. And an important element
in the process would be to identify potential mentors,
train them, and ensure that they are paired with promising
professionals of color. |